nanog mailing list archives
Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry () piermont com>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 1997 19:40:20 -0400
Mike Trest writes:
I believe there is a leagally sound (and often used) claim which NSI can assert regarding their rights in this matter. When the NSF cut back on its willingness to fund the Internet cooperative agreement and the InterNIC was shifted to a fee for Domain Registration service,
You should read the cooperative agreement. Making the registrations self funding was in the agreement from the start. As is, by the way, a clause that says that at the end, they have to turn over everything -- software, databases, everything -- to the NSF. Ten copies, in fact, with reports. Perry Speaking personally, and not in an official capacity - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: NEWDOM: Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read, (continued)
- Re: NEWDOM: Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Perry E. Metzger (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Dave Crocker (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Perry E. Metzger (Apr 26)
- Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Vince Wolodkin (Apr 26)
- Re: NEWDOM: Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Perry E. Metzger (Apr 26)
- Re: NEWDOM: Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Vince Wolodkin (Apr 26)
- Re: NEWDOM: Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Perry E. Metzger (Apr 27)
- Re: NEWDOM: Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Marten Terpstra (Apr 27)
- Re: NEWDOM: Read this...Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Jeff Williams (Apr 27)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Mike Trest (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Perry E. Metzger (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Dave Crocker (Apr 26)
- Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Paul A Vixie (Apr 26)
- Re: NEWDOM: Re: offtopic for NANOG - do not read Michael Dillon (Apr 26)