nanog mailing list archives
Re: An end to spam through Graphnet
From: Jon Stevens <jon () clearink com>
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 97 15:11:07 -0700
"J.D. Falk" <jdfalk () priori net> said the following at 8/1/97 2:36 PM:
The /best/ idea is to have them use a local SMTP server. If they can't or won't do that, there are a few recipes floating around that let you exempt messages from specific sources; I haven't investigated those much, but they're out there.
I just implemented the check_* stuff on my server...it works great and was fairly easy to do... <http://www.informatik.uni-kiel.de/%7Eca/email/check.html> It has already stopped quite a bit of spam and I'm being very good about keeping my junk database up to date... -jon stevens
Current thread:
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Bill Woodcock (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Bill Becker (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Jon Lewis (Aug 02)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Jon Stevens (Aug 02)
- An end to spam through Graphnet Dana Hudes (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Geoff White (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Matthew White (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Greg A. Woods (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Michael Dillon (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet J.D. Falk (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Jon Lewis (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Keith McCallion (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet John-David Childs (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Greg A. Woods (Aug 02)
- Re: An end to spam through Graphnet Geoff White (Aug 02)