nanog mailing list archives

Re: Whoa; the 3 network?


From: Eric Osborne <osborne () notcom com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 22:13:40 -0500 (EST)

Right, but since each border router off of the public Internet can't 
advertise anything smaller than /24 (would *your* router accept an 
advertisement for 3.0.0.0/27?), each seperate office needs at least a /24.
Yeah, NAT can take care of the internal addressing, but you're still stuck 
with the fact that you "only" can have 256 seperate border routers.

I was never arguing that GE needs and/or deserves the full 3.0.0.0, as I have
little or no experience with their network needs.  (I do note, however, that
I can't find *any* of 3.0.0.0/8 in Mae-East via Digex right now).  I believe
it was Lee Ving who said "Let's have a war/We need the space". 


Fini.




eric




Okay...

RFC1918 host
  |
  |
border router  <----+
  |                 |
  |                 |
public internet     |
  |                 |
  |                 |  IP tunnel between corporate offices
border router       |  preserving RFC1918 addressing.
  |                 |
  |                 |
RFC1918 host   <----+

With carefull use of NAT at appropriate points, it is technically
possible to limit the amount of publicly visible addresses you use to
(quite conceivably) 2 or 3 traditional class C blocks. Obviously this
is not necessarily a real world model but you get the picture. I don't
personally believe that an "enterprise" network should ever require
more than one (PERHAPS two) /16 networks. When you get to ISPs and
similar, the need for addresses will rise dramatically but it can
still be kept under control if you're carefull about maintaining
hierarchical addressing structures.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Wayne Bouchard                             GlobalCenter
web () primenet com                           
Primenet Network Operations                Internet Solutions for
(602) 416-6422   800-373-2499 x6422        Growing Businesses
FAX: (602) 416-9422
http://www.primenet.com                    http://www.globalcenter.net
----------------------------------------------------------------------




Current thread: