nanog mailing list archives
Re: Whoa; the 3 network?
From: Eric Osborne <osborne () notcom com>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 22:14:38 -0500 (EST)
At 9:02 PM -0500 12/23/97, Randall Pigott wrote:Look, gang, the reason to do a public ping is that in the last analysis, GE only needs public IP addresses for those infrastructure machines that needSome people block ICMP, but have a lot of other direct internet access. This sort of test only gives one an initial set of questions to ask. It does not answer those questions. Don't kill the investigator yet. And of course, this is a moot issue when one is paying for address space. --Dean
Careful- if you start saying "you can have whatever you pay for", Microsoft may hear you........:) eric (only half-kidding)
Current thread:
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network?, (continued)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Marc Slemko (Dec 23)
- Address Reclaimation bmanning (Dec 23)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Randall Pigott (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Eric Osborne (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Wayne Bouchard (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Eric Osborne (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Wayne Bouchard (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Howard C. Berkowitz (Dec 24)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Henry Steuart (Dec 25)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Dean Anderson (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Eric Osborne (Dec 23)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Dean Anderson (Dec 25)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Richard Welty (Dec 24)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Karl Denninger (Dec 24)
- Message not available
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Jay R. Ashworth (Dec 27)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Randy Bush (Dec 27)
- Message not available
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Ran Atkinson (Dec 31)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Eric Osborne (Dec 31)
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Randall Pigott (Dec 31)
- Message not available
- Re: Whoa; the 3 network? Jay R. Ashworth (Dec 23)