nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC1918 conformance
From: "Jeffrey C. Ollie" <jeff () ollie clive ia us>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 08:01:01 -0600
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- On Thu, 13 Feb 1997 13:47:24 +0300 (MSK), alex () relcom eu net writes:
On Wed, 12 Feb 1997, Dana Hudes wrote:Gated allows you to specify the ospf router id. AS others have mentioned so does Bay. Out of curiousity, is anyone running anything other thanI know it well (really we have few gated-based routers there). Let me to point my mind - it may be usefull to have short reserved address space in the beginning (net 1.0.0.0) and the end (223.255.0.0/16 or simular) address space. CISCO's router-id was used as amazing example _why it mey be usefull_.
I don't think that Internet engineering decisions should be based solely on the basis of Cisco's bad decsisions regarding their OSPF implementation. You claim that there are other reasons why reserving 1.0.0.0/8 and 223.255.0.0/16 are a good idea. Can you share some of these reasons? I'm not totally against reserving these networks, but I do require more convincing. [A copy of the headers and the PGP signature follow.] Date: Thu, 13 Feb 1997 08:01:01 -0600 From: "Jeffrey C. Ollie" <jeff () ollie clive ia us> In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 13 Feb 1997 13:47:24 +0300." <Pine.SUN.3.91.970213134530.11961d-100000@virgin> Subject: Re: RFC1918 conformance To: nanog () merit edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: AnySign 1.4 - A Python tool for PGP signing e-mail and news. iQCVAwUBMwMeopwkOQz8sbZFAQE4gQP+N/jvy38bdxJlsqmiRhbfT9Nga6y5R57G opT5uzRpTa2B17ikDzYUEZgmjtXKcFTj6jCNXmcNoh3Be9g5SDFqZHvaiXUrvVwG Lcorm1iSN/x2HwXfkjKBxP7b2bAvjbCJinpIQp1cWU4BJymemwX+Bjwn7zMTtkl2 4b6oeADxi+A= =nUMC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Jeffrey C. Ollie | Should Work Now (TM) Python Hacker, Mac Lover | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- RFC1918 conformance Pierre Thibaudeau (Feb 10)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Andrew Partan (Feb 10)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Bill Manning (Feb 11)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Andrew Partan (Feb 11)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Tony Bates (Feb 11)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Alex P. Rudnev (Feb 11)
- Re: [NANOG] RFC1918 conformance Jeffrey C. Ollie (Feb 11)
- Re: [NANOG] RFC1918 conformance Alex P. Rudnev (Feb 12)
- Re: [NANOG] RFC1918 conformance Dana Hudes (Feb 12)
- Re: [NANOG] RFC1918 conformance Alex P. Rudnev (Feb 13)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Jeffrey C. Ollie (Feb 13)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Bill Manning (Feb 11)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Andrew Partan (Feb 10)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Andrew Partan (Feb 11)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Tony Bates (Feb 17)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance bgp4-adm (Feb 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Brett D. Watson (Feb 10)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance David Schwartz (Feb 10)