nanog mailing list archives
Re: RFC1918 conformance
From: David Schwartz <davids () wiznet net>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 1997 18:18:27 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 10 Feb 1997, Brett D. Watson wrote:
while what you say is absolutely true (people shouldn't advertise them) i would say that it's as much your responsibility to block them at your edge routers.
After several recent incidents involving obviously incorrect advertisements from several of the 'big name' companies, I've concluded that it's as important to filter their advertisements for sanity as it is for one's own customers. David Schwartz WIZnet - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: [NANOG] RFC1918 conformance, (continued)
- Re: [NANOG] RFC1918 conformance Jeffrey C. Ollie (Feb 11)
- Re: [NANOG] RFC1918 conformance Alex P. Rudnev (Feb 12)
- Re: [NANOG] RFC1918 conformance Dana Hudes (Feb 12)
- Re: [NANOG] RFC1918 conformance Alex P. Rudnev (Feb 13)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Jeffrey C. Ollie (Feb 13)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Andrew Partan (Feb 11)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance Tony Bates (Feb 17)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance bgp4-adm (Feb 10)
- Re: RFC1918 conformance David Schwartz (Feb 10)