nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP announcements and small providers
From: Bradley Dunn <bradley () dunn org>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 1997 14:31:46 -0500 (EST)
On Wed, 26 Feb 1997, Lyndon Levesley wrote:
Nameservers are a bit harder to renumber, but that's not too bad.
When you have hundreds of virtual web sites?
Wonder how long it'll be before ISPs rather than corporates start to use NAT for most of their network.
When our customers stop wanting to use applications that carry IP addresses at the application layer. Until then, NAT is a no-go. pbd - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers, (continued)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Alex.Bligh (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Michael Dillon (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Tim Pozar (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Chris Phillips (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Stan Barber (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Paul Ferguson (Feb 25)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Karl Denninger (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Sean Rolinson (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Michael Dillon (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Lyndon Levesley (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Bradley Dunn (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Douglas Warren (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Adrian Bool (Feb 28)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Karl Denninger (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Karl Denninger (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Philip J. Nesser II (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Karl Denninger (Feb 26)
- Re: BGP announcements and small providers Alex.Bligh (Feb 28)