nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Big Squeeze
From: Paul Ferguson <pferguso () cisco com>
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 1997 00:28:10 -0500
At 04:03 PM 3/2/97 -0600, Scott Huddle wrote:
I'll assert that if the costs of accepting a route announcement are non-zero that this can only happen if there is a market for announcements and a system of settlements between providers. If the costs are zero, then why have the filters?
I'd suggest that costs are non-zero, and they cannot be quantified by dollars, at least today. Since the majority of instability in the global Internet is originated by prefixes longer than /19's, the amount of resources consumed is an exercise left for the reader. - paul - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: The Big Squeeze, (continued)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Kim Hubbard (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Sean Donelan (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Alan Barrett (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Erik Sherk (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Alec H. Peterson (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Avi Freedman (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Bradley Dunn (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Peter Galbavy (Mar 04)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Tony Barber (Mar 04)