nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Big Squeeze
From: Bradley Dunn <bradley () dunn org>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 06:59:32 -0500 (EST)
On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Sean Donelan wrote:
Is the route computation of a /8 prefix flapping once a second any different than a /24 flapping once a second? If /8's are "naturally" more stable, then why allow them to flap more before dampening them?
It's just another incentive to renumber into larger aggregate blocks. A provider can say to a customer: "If your /24 flaps you're going to be unreachable from some parts of the net for longer than you would if you renumber into our block." pbd - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- RE: The Big Squeeze, (continued)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Kim Hubbard (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Sean Donelan (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Alan Barrett (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Erik Sherk (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Alec H. Peterson (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Avi Freedman (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Randy Bush (Mar 02)
- RE: The Big Squeeze Jim Fleming (Mar 02)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Bradley Dunn (Mar 03)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Peter Galbavy (Mar 04)
- Re: The Big Squeeze Tony Barber (Mar 04)