nanog mailing list archives
Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs
From: Vadim Antonov <avg () pluris com>
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 11:30:57 -0700
smd () clock org (Sean M. Doran) wrote:
It's sad that apparently the Internet has evolved to the point where politicians move faster than standards-makers.
I beg to disagree. The Internet has evolved to the point where politicans make standards. This is a sad state of affairs, indeed. Windows at 11. --vadim - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Current thread:
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs, (continued)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs J.D. Falk (May 28)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Sean M. Doran (May 29)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs John M. Brown (May 24)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Owen DeLong (May 27)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Dory Ethan Leifer (May 28)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Owen DeLong (May 27)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Dave O'Shea (May 24)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Matthew James Gering (May 26)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs J.D. Falk (May 26)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Russell Nelson (May 26)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Curt Howland (May 27)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Vadim Antonov (May 29)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs Kent W. England (May 29)
- Re: Murkowski anti-spam bill could be a problem for ISPs John McCann (May 30)