nanog mailing list archives
Re: moving to IPv6
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw () insync net>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 17:18:57 -0600 (CST)
On Sat, 1 Nov 1997, Paul Ferguson wrote:
[playing devil's advocate here] Of course, there is a rather large contingent of the Internet community that is of the opinion that IPv6 is a solution in search of a problem. - paul
Is that why Cisco is one of the few networking companies that participate in the 6bone? :) Joe Shaw - jshaw () insync net NetAdmin - Insync Internet Services
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful Robert E. Seastrom (Nov 01)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David R. Conrad (Nov 01)
- moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Paul Ferguson (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Peter Galbavy (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Scott W Brim (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vijay Gill (Nov 01)
- moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Nikos Mouat (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Joe Shaw (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Dorian R. Kim (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Brett Frankenberger (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jerry Scharf (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Pedro Marques (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 02)