nanog mailing list archives
Re: moving to IPv6
From: "Dorian R. Kim" <dorian () blackrose org>
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 1997 19:42:36 -0500 (EST)
On Mon, 3 Nov 1997, Joe Shaw wrote:
On Sat, 1 Nov 1997, Paul Ferguson wrote:[playing devil's advocate here] Of course, there is a rather large contingent of the Internet community that is of the opinion that IPv6 is a solution in search of a problem.Is that why Cisco is one of the few networking companies that participate in the 6bone? :)
Participation in 6bone != belief that IPv6 is the solution to the problems of today. After all, some of us like hallucinogenic hobbies. -dorian
Current thread:
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful, (continued)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David R. Conrad (Nov 01)
- moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Paul Ferguson (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Peter Galbavy (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Scott W Brim (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vijay Gill (Nov 01)
- moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Nikos Mouat (Nov 01)
- Re: Spam Control Considered Harmful David R. Conrad (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Joe Shaw (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Dorian R. Kim (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Sean M. Doran (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Brett Frankenberger (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Vadim Antonov (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Randy Bush (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Jerry Scharf (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Pedro Marques (Nov 03)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 01)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Phil Howard (Nov 02)
- Re: moving to IPv6 Alex Bligh (Nov 02)