nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
From: Danny McPherson <danny () genuity net>
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 1997 18:37:22 -0700
And since I helped *create* the CA*net database *and* the CA*net route filters based on the various DBs, yes, I meant RADB.
How many providers actually apply prefix-based filtering (based on IRR objects) to other providers? I like the idea of prefix-based filtering applied to customers (by everyone that claims to be tier 1 & 2 (&3), at the very least), as well as the idea of configuring static filters for /19s and such, but if I were to build 46K++ lines of ACLs to filter prefixes from all eBGP peers for all registered prefixes (from several different registries) .. my routers wouldn't be manageable. -danny
Current thread:
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU, (continued)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Sean M. Doran (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David Carmean (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU David R. Conrad (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Alec H. Peterson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Kevin Oberman (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Selina F. Priestley (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU John A. Tamplin (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Cengiz Alaettinoglu (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Steve Meuse (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU ken emery (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Jay Borkenhagen (Oct 09)