nanog mailing list archives
Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU
From: Jay Borkenhagen <jayb () att com>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 10:26:10 -0400
On Thu, 09 Oct 1997 06:01:19 -0700, Mark Milhollan <mlm () ftel net> said:
What about the cable providers that have chunks of 24/8?62/8, 63/8 and 64/8 are being assigned now. So you just relax the filters according to what's being assigned.
Mark> AT&T has been allocating customers from 12/8. Yes, we are, but allocation to customers and assignment by registries are different things: AT&T has been assigned 12/8, and we're announcing 12/8. Customers are being allocated portions of this non-portable space, and you'll only see more-specifics when our customers multi-home. This is just like any other CIDR block used for customers. No one is currently assigned 62/8, for example, so no one should be announcing 62/8. Jay B. -- Jay Borkenhagen jayb () att com AT&T WorldNet Service PGP: 09 2F 9B 83 7E 6A DC 51 2D 4A 1C FD C9 45 98 44
Current thread:
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU, (continued)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU C. Harald Koch (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Neil J. McRae (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Danny McPherson (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU John A. Tamplin (Oct 08)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Cengiz Alaettinoglu (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Mark Milhollan (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Steve Meuse (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU ken emery (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Jay Borkenhagen (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Phil Howard (Oct 09)
- Re: UUNet Routing SNAFU Jay Borkenhagen (Oct 09)