nanog mailing list archives
Re: NAP Architecture
From: "Alec H. Peterson" <ahp () hilander com>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 1997 12:28:33 -0500
On Wed, Oct 29, 1997 at 08:25:33AM -0800, Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI wrote:
Forgive my ignorance on these matters, but why haven't many NAPS tried to be L1 based, or at least provide the option of private wire/fiber between the larger customers in the same room. It seems to me that this would significantly reduce the complexity and packet-loss we're currently seeing. How long would it take to troubleshoot a cross-over FE compared to trouble shooting two routers connected via a oversubscribed switch.
The PAIX is doing something very similar to this. The prices for interconnects between cages are very reasonable. Alec -- +------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+ |Alec Peterson - ahp () hilander com | Erols Internet Services, INC. | |Network Engineer | Springfield, VA. | +------------------------------------+--------------------------------------+
Current thread:
- Re: NAP Architecture, (continued)
- Re: NAP Architecture Chris A. Icide (Oct 23)
- Re: NAP Architecture Neil J. McRae (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Vijay Gill (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alec H. Peterson (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Neil J. McRae (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Vijay Gill (Oct 24)
- Re: NAP Architecture Kent W. England (Oct 28)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture the Riz (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alec H. Peterson (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Mike Leber (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Bill Manning (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture bmanning (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Ben Kirkpatrick, ELI (Oct 29)
- Re: NAP Architecture Alex Rubenstein (Oct 30)
- Re: NAP Architecture Leigh Porter (Oct 29)