nanog mailing list archives
Re: oh, for goodness' sake.
From: Karl Denninger <karl () mcs net>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 1998 12:49:15 -0500
On Wed, Apr 08, 1998 at 08:30:07AM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
At 11:44 PM 4/7/98 -0700, Michael Dillon wrote:services (not the web server) to another TLD. Perhaps it should be whois.ripe.int? Since the IPv6 equivalent of in-addr.arpa lives in .INT this makes sense to me.I think that placing such critical domain references under .INT is a reasonable idea. However, RIPE isn't a treaty organization and the rules for new .INT names is pretty specific. And IANA is rather careful about following the rules. Jon Postel's directive is that any proposal needs to have very precise rules, so the first step in getting groups like RIPE authorized under .INT is to write a set of rules that will mechanically determine who is authorized. Perhaps a place to start is by qualifying any organization that has administrative or operations responsibilities directly assigned by IANA. d/ ________________________________________________________________________ Dave Crocker Brandenburg Consulting +1 408 246 8253 dcrocker () brandenburg com 675 Spruce Drive (f) +1 408 249 6205 www.brandenburg.com Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
Such critical resources simply should not be under any non-operational umbrella of any kind, and particularly not a treaty-driven one. If there ever was an argument for a TLD for network-management resources (such as whois servers and the like) this is it. However, the nameserver infrastructure for such a TLD needs to go *far* beyond *any* existing TLD's nameserver infrastructure. You're talking here about things that need near, or even at, military-grade reliability levels of service. -- -- Karl Denninger (karl () MCS Net)| MCSNet - Serving Chicagoland and Wisconsin http://www.mcs.net/ | T1's from $600 monthly / All Lines K56Flex/DOV | NEW! Corporate ISDN Prices dropped by up to 50%! Voice: [+1 312 803-MCS1 x219]| EXCLUSIVE NEW FEATURE ON ALL PERSONAL ACCOUNTS Fax: [+1 312 803-4929] | *SPAMBLOCK* Technology now included at no cost
Current thread:
- oh, for goodness' sake. Danny O'Brien (Apr 07)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Andrew Crawford (Apr 07)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Jon Zeeff (Apr 07)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. J.D. Falk (Apr 07)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Karl Denninger (Apr 07)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Ryan Brooks (Apr 07)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Michael Dillon (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Dave Crocker (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Karl Denninger (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Stephen Sprunk (Apr 09)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Karl Denninger (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Andrew Crawford (Apr 07)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. David R. Conrad (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Michael Dillon (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Stephen Sprunk (Apr 09)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Dave Crocker (Apr 08)
- Message not available
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. davidk (Apr 10)