nanog mailing list archives
Re: oh, for goodness' sake.
From: Dave Crocker <dcrocker () brandenburg com>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 1998 12:07:43 -0700
At 07:41 AM 4/8/98 +0800, David R. Conrad wrote:
I think that placing such critical domain references under .INT is a reasonable idea.I suspect this could be controversial given .INT is supposed to be administered by the ITU... :-) Since we're already saddled with .arpa and it is already used for (arguably) critical infrastructure goop, why not use it?
I wasn't trying to argue in favor of .INT, merely in favor of a rigorous definition of who gets one of these ops-related registrations and who doesn't. d/ ________________________________________________________________________ Dave Crocker Brandenburg Consulting +1 408 246 8253 dcrocker () brandenburg com 675 Spruce Drive (f) +1 408 249 6205 www.brandenburg.com Sunnyvale, CA 94086 USA
Current thread:
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake., (continued)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Karl Denninger (Apr 07)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Ryan Brooks (Apr 07)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Michael Dillon (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Dave Crocker (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Karl Denninger (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Stephen Sprunk (Apr 09)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Karl Denninger (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. David R. Conrad (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Michael Dillon (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Stephen Sprunk (Apr 09)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Dave Crocker (Apr 08)
- Message not available
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. davidk (Apr 10)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Justin W. Newton (Apr 07)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Forrest W. Christian (Apr 08)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Andy Rabagliati (Apr 09)
- Re: oh, for goodness' sake. Alex P. Rudnev (Apr 10)