nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBN Peering issues
From: shields () crosslink net (Michael Shields)
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1998 07:59:21 +0000 (GMT)
fundamentally important that these ideals be extended to the future of the Internet, if it is to have a future. No company should have the right to force another to pay for connectivity simply because the latter has not been around since the beginning or they are not a telco.
BBN is answerable to their customers and shareholders and not to your or my ideals of how the Internet should work. -- Shields, CrossLink.
Current thread:
- Re: BBN Peering issues, (continued)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 13)
- Message not available
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Dan Ritter (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Dan Ritter (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Robert Bowman (Aug 14)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Forrest W. Christian (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Karl Denninger (Aug 15)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Mark Tripod (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Michael Shields (Aug 16)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Todd 'Mr Vendor Relations' Nagengast (Aug 16)
- Message not available
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 17)
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jon Zeeff (Aug 18)
- Message not available
- Re: BBN Peering issues Jay R. Ashworth (Aug 13)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues David Greenman (Aug 12)
- Re: BBN Peering issues alex (Aug 12)