nanog mailing list archives
Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement
From: "Sean M. Doran" <smd () clock org>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 09:18:24 -0700
Alec - You don't want to _measure_ traffic distribution, you want to use a barrier approach. This avoids messy disputes over how much should be paid for, in favour of less-messy disputes over whether the quality of what one has paid for is worthwhile. Sean.
Current thread:
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement, (continued)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Owen DeLong (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Jason Zigmont (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Alec H. Peterson (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement steve (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Alec H. Peterson (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Robert Bowman (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Alec H. Peterson (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Owen DeLong (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Vadim Antonov (Aug 26)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Patrick Greenwell (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Vadim Antonov (Aug 26)