nanog mailing list archives
Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement
From: Patrick Greenwell <patrick () namesecure com>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 13:30:13 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 25 Aug 1998, Jerry Scharf wrote:
who pays for the root nameserver traffic? The ISC goes out of business if we have to pay the traffic rates for keeping a root.
<SARCASM> Well, as Sean Doran so eloquently pointed out(paraphrasing): "If you like name resolution, please send a cheque for $x to the following address..." </SARCASM> /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ Patrick Greenwell (800) 299-1288 v Systems Administrator (925) 377-1212 v NameSecure (925) 377-1414 f \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/
Current thread:
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement, (continued)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement steve (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Alec H. Peterson (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Robert Bowman (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Alec H. Peterson (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Vadim Antonov (Aug 26)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Patrick Greenwell (Aug 25)
- Re: Generation of traffic in "settled" peering arrangement Vadim Antonov (Aug 26)