nanog mailing list archives
Re: MTU of the Internet?
From: Mark Boolootian <booloo () cats ucsc edu>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 11:01:53 -0800 (PST)
Curtis Villamizar's Feb 97 NANOG talk has some relevant and interesting info. See http://www.academ.com/nanog/feb1997/TCP-LOSS.html
<lots of speculation about packet sizes and mtus and the occasional bash at pmtud and microsfot thrown in for good measure>
To paraphrase a well-known quote, those who do not study history are condemned to re-invent it.
Current thread:
- Re: MTU of the Internet?, (continued)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Stephen Sprunk (Feb 06)
- Message not available
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jay R. Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Perry E. Metzger (Feb 06)
- Message not available
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jay R. Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Douglas Tooley (Feb 08)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Christopher Masto (Feb 09)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 09)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Patrick W. Gilmore (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Mark Boolootian (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Lincoln Dale (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Phil Howard (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Kent W. England (Feb 05)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Per Gregers Bilse (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? George Swallow (Feb 06)
- Message not available
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Jay R. Ashworth (Feb 06)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Sean M. Doran (Feb 07)
- Re: MTU of the Internet? Paul A Vixie (Feb 07)