nanog mailing list archives

Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff?


From: John Butler <jbutler () digisle net>
Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 16:36:21 -0700

This is 100% correct. Many firms are starting to require that vendors, consultants, etc. have "Y2K Compliancy Guarantees" in their contracts and will not do business without them. The penalties can be high...

At 07:22 PM 5/8/98 -0400, jkucic () kpmg com wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Eric Germann <ekgermann () CCTEC COM>,Internet writes:
>
>>Do we really care if an unmanaged hub is Y2K compliant? As long as it
>>forwards packets....
>
>I don't but its an opportunity to sell the client. And if you don't test it I
>recommend you don't get quoted saying it doesn't matter unless you want a
>lawsuit if anything happens.
>
>Customers want everything in writing to be Year 200 compliant or not having any
>affect on their operation and in many cases regulators are mandating it in
>writing.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Joe Kucic
>
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* John Butler * TEL: 415-228-4142 *
* Systems Engineer * FAX: 415-228-4141 *
* DIGITAL ISLAND * EMAIL: jbutler () digisle net *
* http://www.digisle.net * EPAGE: jbutler.page () digisle net *
* * * * * * DIGITAL ISLAND - One hop to the world * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *


Current thread: