nanog mailing list archives

Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff?

From: shields () crosslink net (Michael Shields)
Date: 09 May 1998 18:12:53 +0000

In article <199805081541.LAA00096 () cctvw02 cctec com>,
Eric Germann <ekgermann () CCTEC COM> wrote:

BTW, saw a great ad the other day from Nortel on y2k compliance on T1
concentrators.  Anyone have any idea why it matters in a mux, if it isn't
managed?


Probably for the same reason Tripp-Lite UPSes are "Internet Ready" --
marketing buzzword completeness.
-- 
Shields, CrossLink.

Current thread:

Re (2): Core router bakeoff? jkucic (May 08)
- Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Eric Germann (May 08)
  - Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Dalvenjah FoxFire (May 08)
    - Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Michael Dillon (May 08)
    - Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Forrest W. Christian (May 09)
  - Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Michael Shields (May 09)
    - Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Dean Anderson (May 11)
    - Message not available
    - Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Jay R. Ashworth (May 11)
    - Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Dean Robb (May 11)
    - Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Scott Whyte (May 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? jkucic (May 08)
  - Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? John Butler (May 08)
  - Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Patrick W. Gilmore (May 08)
- Re (2): Core router bakeoff? jkucic (May 08)
- Re: Re (2): Core router bakeoff? Greg Ketell (May 11)