nanog mailing list archives
Re: The questions stand
From: Jim Dixon <jdd () vbc net>
Date: Mon, 25 May 1998 09:54:07 +0100 (BST)
On Wed, 20 May 1998, Jim Browne wrote:
In fact, I could operate the exchange as a co-op, _owned_ by all the local providers.That has already happened in a number of rural areas and some metro areas (Colorado Co-op?). The problem traditionally has been getting small competing providers to cooperate.
It has also happened in the UK, where both of the two exchanges are co-ops owned by their members. Both the LINX (http://www.linx.org) in London and MaNAP (http://www.manap.org) in Manchester are run along the lines of clubs, with operational guidelines laid down by their members. Both are growing rapidly, act to keep local traffic local, and have ample capacity. Costs to members are low and the benefit returned, especially at the LINX (which is considerably older), far exceeds the cost to each member. But if the UK experience is anything to go by, if the exchange is to succeed it must be neutral, and in particular it must not sell bandwidth. At both UK exchanges, the members have consistently rejected any sale of bandwidth by the exchange or any use of the exchange for sale of transit. In order for this model to work, someone else must provide the colocation facilities. The LINX is based at Telehouse Europe, a large purpose-built building which is the hub of the UK telecommunications system. The LINX itself is a non-profit coop; Telehouse is run for a profit (and is very profitable indeed). MaNAP is based at the University of Manchester, in a facility that used to house the university's supercomputer. Venture capital has funded a new colocation facility several hundred yards away (Telecity), and MaNAP will shortly expand into the new facility, linking its two halves by fiber optics. In both cases the exchanges apply pressure on the colocation facility operators to improve the quality of their offerings. Splitting MaNAP between Telecity and the University puts pressure on both suppliers to reduce costs and improve service.
From our experience, what is needed for a successful exchange is
* a local market of decent size (there are about 16 million people in the Liverpool-Manchester-Leeds corridor) * an exchange organized as a coop, one that guarantees that it will not compete with its members * openness; it must not just be an "us against them" grouping of little guys - the larger ISPs must feel comfortable in joining * technical competence * good colocation facilities with round the clock security, 24x7 access, and preferably 24x7 remote hands Counter-intuitively, it appears that the more independent the exchange is of the colocation facility, the more successful the colocation facility is likely to be as an investment. -- Jim Dixon VBCnet GB Ltd http://www.vbc.net tel +44 117 929 1316 fax +44 117 927 2015
Current thread:
- The questions stand Pickett, David (May 20)
- Re: The questions stand Karl Denninger (May 20)
- Re: The questions stand Richard Irving (May 20)
- Re: The questions stand Karl Denninger (May 20)
- Re: The questions stand Michael Dillon (May 20)
- Message not available
- Re: The questions stand Jay R. Ashworth (May 20)
- Re: The questions stand Brian Horvitz (May 20)
- Message not available
- Re: The questions stand Jay R. Ashworth (May 20)
- Re: The questions stand Jim Browne (May 20)
- Re: The questions stand Jim Dixon (May 25)
- Re: The questions stand Brian Horvitz (May 21)
- Re: The questions stand Richard Irving (May 20)
- Re: The questions stand Karl Denninger (May 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: The questions stand Rob Wilson (May 20)
- Re: The questions stand John Fraizer - Administrator (May 21)
- Message not available
- Re: The questions stand Jay R. Ashworth (May 21)
- Message not available
- Re: The questions stand Karl Denninger (May 21)
- Re: The questions stand Scott Gardner Anderson (May 26)