nanog mailing list archives
Re: The Great Exchange
From: shields () crosslink net (Michael Shields)
Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 23:00:43 +0000 (GMT)
Michael Shields writes:Despite preductions, very few resources have ever actually become "too cheap to meter".Television? Local phone service in many places? Matchbooks? Sewer service?
Television's incremental cost of another viewer is zero, and always has been. This is not a matter of being too cheap to meter. Matchbooks are not given away in unlimited quantities. I honestly have no idea how sewer service is priced, or how the US came to have flat-rate local calling. -- Shields, CrossLink.
Current thread:
- Re: The Great Exchange, (continued)
- Re: The Great Exchange Perry E. Metzger (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Miquel van Smoorenburg (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Vadim Antonov (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Shields (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Jerry Scharf (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Vadim Antonov (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Tim Pozar (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Perry E. Metzger (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Shields (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 28)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Shields (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Perry E. Metzger (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Michael Shields (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: The Great Exchange Jay R. Ashworth (May 29)
- Re: The Great Exchange Tom Perrine (May 27)
- Re: The Great Exchange Phillip Vandry (May 28)