nanog mailing list archives
Re: time for a new list?
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw () insync net>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 21:01:37 -0600 (CST)
I think moderating the group might not be such a bad idea. The only problem with this would be getting someone who had enough time to actually moderate the list. I don't know what is going on lately, but it seems egos and animosity are running rampant on both inet-access and nanog. I have been caught up in it myself, and for that I apologize. Regards, Joseph Shaw - jshaw () insync net NetAdmin/Security - Insync Internet Services Free UNIX advocate - "I hack, therefore I am." On Mon, 2 Nov 1998, Eric Kozowski wrote:
i know it's come up in the past, but i think it's way past time for a new list for nano's with tighter subscription and posting requirements. the only reason i haven't unsubscribed to nanog, yet, is everytime i've had enough of the useless crap, someone actually posts something useful.... -- Eric Kozowski eric () haydenisland verio net Non carborundum illigitimi
Current thread:
- time for a new list? Eric Kozowski (Nov 02)
- Re: time for a new list? Joe Shaw (Nov 02)
- Re: time for a new list? Keith McCallion (Nov 02)
- Re: time for a new list? Steven J. Sobol (Nov 02)
- Re: time for a new list? Richard Irving (Nov 03)
- Message not available
- Re: time for a new list? Jay R. Ashworth (Nov 03)
- Re: time for a new list? Keith McCallion (Nov 02)
- Re: time for a new list? Joe Shaw (Nov 02)
- Re: time for a new list? Phil Howard (Nov 03)
- [ADMINISTRIVIA] Re: time for a new list? Edward S. Marshall (Nov 03)
- Re: [ADMINISTRIVIA] Re: time for a new list? Phil Howard (Nov 04)
- Re: time for a new list? Eric Kozowski (Nov 02)
- Re: time for a new list? Robert Szarka (Nov 09)
- Re: time for a new list? Richard Irving (Nov 09)