nanog mailing list archives
Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited
From: "melinda b. thompson" <ima () badhabit org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1998 06:11:41 -0800
At 9:45 AM -0800 11/16/98, Ron_Johnson () enron net wrote:
I don't really see this as SPAM. It's is annoying, but I would place it in the same classification as a credit card company, one that I hold a card from. sending me junk mail. Since they (Network solutions), have developed this mailing list from infomation you provided to them in registering domain(s). They are entitled to contact you. You may, of course complain, and they (Network solutions), are of course are entitled to take no action. Ron Johnson
ron, the difference is, if you hold a credit card from a company that contacts you all the time with at best uninteresting offers, you have the CHOICE to seek another credit card company. at the MOMENT, who of us has an option to seek another company to register domains with? it's spam. in my humble opinion, paul, they should be warned that they are in danger of being added to the blackhole list...if and only because so many of us DO have to rely on them. the warning should be along the lines of no UCE, put something on your webpage for an opt IN choice if someone does want to receive information on this site. if they don't respond...*shrug* treat them just like any other spammer. personally i think it is worse that they are sending UCE because they know they have a captive audience and there isn't TOO much we can do about it. melinda thompson ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ life is a constant stream of people coming into and out of your life... sometimes you get to grab hold of one or two of them for a while... ima () badhabit org http://www.ircd.com/meldatlist.html PGP Fingerprint: 5E9F 31EF DF11 A3EF F3E4 CB3C 9F42 2EC8 BCD0 C607 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Current thread:
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited, (continued)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Ron_Johnson (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Paul A Vixie (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Dean Robb (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Karl Denninger (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Tim Pozar (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Paul A Vixie (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Dean Robb (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Steven J. Sobol (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Leo Bicknell (Nov 17)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited J.D. Falk (Nov 17)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Paul A Vixie (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Ron_Johnson (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited melinda b. thompson (Nov 17)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Sarah Baker (Nov 17)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Paul Vixie (Nov 17)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Jared Mauch (Nov 17)
- RE: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Chris Woodfield (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Rodney Joffe (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Steven J. Sobol (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Mike Reno (Nov 16)
- Re: RBL quandry - opinions hereby solicited Steven J. Sobol (Nov 16)