nanog mailing list archives
Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?
From: Barry Shein <bzs () world std com>
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 1998 13:43:03 -0400
On October 1, 1998 at 08:05 harter () feeding frenzy com (Sam Hayes Merritt, III) wrote:
On Thu, 1 Oct 1998, Barry Shein wrote:The problem is mass spammers operating from within that domain forging legitimate host names into their spam. They're advertising a porn site within the .to domain.And? .com has this problem too
Com does not have the problem that it's nearly exclusively used for these kinds of things. If com had just about zero commercial sites you might have a point. The .to domain seems to have about zero sites having anything to do with Tonga (no one has yet pointed even one out to me) or any entity organized within Tonga. Even the site which appears by its name to be the Consulate of Tonga (sfconsulate.gov.to) is an ad for a software company and says nothing about Tonga. The San Francisco Consulate of the Kingdom of Tonga is listed by the US State Dept as the contact point for visas etc. That's a different kettle of fish.
So does .tj and .cc and .nu at times A registry/registar should not have to police their domains, that isn't their purpose in life. You are advocating taking away a countried ccTLD because they are using it at as a gTLD. http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/rfc1591.txt: In cases when there are persistent problems with the proper operation of a domain, the delegation may be revoked, and possibly delegated to another designated manager. But that paragraph is located with describing how the TLD should technically be operated. Sam
-- -Barry Shein Software Tool & Die | bzs () world std com | http://www.world.com Purveyors to the Trade | Voice: 617-739-0202 | Login: 617-739-WRLD The World | Public Access Internet | Since 1989 *oo*
Current thread:
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed?, (continued)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Adam D. McKenna (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? scott w (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Aaron Goldblatt (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Message not available
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Jay R. Ashworth (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? scott w (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Sam Hayes Merritt, III (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Steven J. Sobol (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? up (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Karl Mueller (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Barry Shein (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Karl Mueller (Oct 01)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Michael Dillon (Oct 02)
- Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Magnus Bergman (Oct 01)
- [DIE] Re: Is the .to (Tonga) domain completely rogue and should be removed? Ravi Pina (Oct 01)