nanog mailing list archives
Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses)
From: "Ehab Hadi" <ehabh () hotmail com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 20:18:48 PST
And not only that. Each ISP has it's own applications, requirement, and traffic patterns. Deploying various IGP might add values. --Ehab
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 1999 14:06:51 -0500 To: Antoni Przygienda <prz () dnrc bell-labs com> From: Scott Brim <swb () newbridge com> Subject: Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Cc: nanog () merit edu At 12:46 PM 1/8/99 -0500, Antoni Przygienda wrote: ISPs are customers here and until the world convergeson one protocol (if it ever will), their needs should be met.If we do see pressure for convergence, it will be evidence that we've lost our hold on the multi-tier model. If we like the multi-tier model (and so far it's been useful) then we want to continue to make the IGP you run in a given domain a local matter. If it weren't we never would have seen OSPF or ISIS deployed widely in the first place. Cordiali saluti ... Scott
______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Current thread:
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses), (continued)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Antoni Przygienda (Jan 08)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Scott Brim (Jan 08)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Sean Donelan (Jan 05)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Andrew Partan (Jan 05)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) bmanning (Jan 05)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Tony Li (Jan 06)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Paul G. Donner (Jan 06)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Niels Chr. Bank-Pedersen (Jan 06)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Andrew Partan (Jan 05)
- RE: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Dan Rabb (Jan 06)
- RE: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 06)
- Re: IGP Comparison (Summary of Responses) Ehab Hadi (Jan 08)