nanog mailing list archives
Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 22:52:24 -0800 (PST)
Modern equipment should be able to handle the quantity of secondary/alias addresses needed to deal with number of /30s required to uniquely number each bi-lat, no?
do i want to find out if ciscos and junipers can handle a hundred+ secondary addresses? and do we want to maintain such configurations?? randy
Current thread:
- aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Howard C. Berkowitz (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Michael P. Lyle (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Stephen Stuart (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Alan Hannan (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Howard C. Berkowitz (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Jessica Yu (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Abha Ahuja (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Richard Irving (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Kevin Oberman (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications bmanning (Jan 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Danny McPherson (Jan 25)