nanog mailing list archives
Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications
From: Alan Hannan <alan () globalcenter net>
Date: Sun, 24 Jan 1999 23:02:46 -0800
Modern equipment should be able to handle the quantity of secondary/alias addresses needed to deal with number of /30s required to uniquely number each bi-lat, no?do i want to find out if ciscos and junipers can handle a hundred+ secondary addresses? and do we want to maintain such configurations??
it is odd to see you ask questions about yourself. it is well known that modern routers can easily maintain logical interfaces in excess of 300. this should not be an issue. what you want to do is up to you, what one can do is of interesting discussion on this mailing list. -alan
Current thread:
- aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Howard C. Berkowitz (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Michael P. Lyle (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Stephen Stuart (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Alan Hannan (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Randy Bush (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Howard C. Berkowitz (Jan 24)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Jessica Yu (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Abha Ahuja (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Richard Irving (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Kevin Oberman (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications bmanning (Jan 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Danny McPherson (Jan 25)
- Re: aads renumbering rumor and implications Curt Howland (Jan 25)