Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus

[Christian Nielsen <cnielsen () nielsen net>]

On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Gordon Cook wrote:

> I am sorry Christian but if you cared enough to read the message to 
> which you are posting you would see that I am not taking part in this 
> conversation

My mistake... Gordon did not write the statement below. I apologize to Gordon
for making the statement.

but in any case, this is peering issues... not a death issue

> > On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Fletcher E Kittredge wrote:
> >
> > > Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this
> > > position.
> > >
> > > If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should
> > > the press not report it?
> > >
> > > If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report
> > > it?
> > >
> > > If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it?
> > >
> > > There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous
> > > press is a profound good for society....
> >
> > I am sorry gordon, i have a hard time seeing how something killing people is
> > the same as peering.
> >
> > Christian
>
> ****************************************************************
> The COOK Report on Internet      Index to 8 years of the COOK  Report
> 431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA  http://cookreport.com
> (609) 882-2572 (phone & fax)             Battle for Cyberspace: How
> cook () cookreport com                     Crucial Technical . . . - 392 pages
> just published. See  http://cookreport.com/ipbattle.shtml
> ****************************************************************