nanog mailing list archives

Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus


From: Ehud Gavron <GAVRON () ACES COM>
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 18:43:10 -0700 (MST)


This argument is specious.  Gordon isn't press.  Well, garlic press
maybe.  

Ehud
p.s. "press credentials" are not hard to fake, but ask Gordon for his


On Mon, 03 Apr 2000 21:47:50 -0400  Paul Ferguson wrote:

surprised not to see this mentioned on NANOG

Sent:  Friday, March 31, 2000
To:    Notify
Subject:       Exodus Customer Confidential Communication


Gordon,

Does the word "confidential" elude you?

- paul

Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this
position.

If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should
the press not report it?

If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report
it?

If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it?

There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous
press is a profound good for society....

regards,
fletcher
P.S.  "Scandal-Monger", Safire, William, 2000




Current thread: