nanog mailing list archives
RE: surge in spam email (fwd)
From: "Derek J. Balling" <dredd () megacity org>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 13:48:47 -0700
I think the point is that the spammers are currently inside the US or have interests in the US: the goal should be the hammer the spammer, not the (negligently) innocent relay.
So then the spammers themselves move offshore, doing "marketing" for US companies, putting their tactics outside the reach. Unless you want to broadly be able to penalize the US companies for the actions of foreign-based contractors' actions committed outside of the US (a very hairy idea, legally, I would think... rats nest)
D
Current thread:
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd), (continued)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Barry Shein (Aug 10)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Greg A. Woods (Aug 10)
- RE: surge in spam email (fwd) Roeland M.J. Meyer (Aug 10)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Shawn McMahon (Aug 11)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) J.D. Falk (Aug 11)
- Message not available
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) J.D. Falk (Aug 11)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Andrew McNamara (Aug 09)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Steven J. Sobol (Aug 09)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Brad (Aug 09)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Henry R. Linneweh (Aug 09)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Jim Mercer (Aug 09)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Pim van Riezen (Aug 09)
- RE: surge in spam email (fwd) Greg A. Woods (Aug 10)