nanog mailing list archives
Re: surge in spam email (fwd)
From: Jim Mercer <jim () reptiles org>
Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 16:59:07 -0400
On Wed, Aug 09, 2000 at 01:48:47PM -0700, Derek J. Balling wrote:
I think the point is that the spammers are currently inside the US or have interests in the US: the goal should be the hammer the spammer, not the (negligently) innocent relay.So then the spammers themselves move offshore, doing "marketing" for US companies, putting their tactics outside the reach. Unless you want to broadly be able to penalize the US companies for the actions of foreign-based contractors' actions committed outside of the US (a very hairy idea, legally, I would think... rats nest)
forward lists of the US entities in the spam-content to the IRS. that'll fix 'em -- [ Jim Mercer jim () reptiles org +1 416 410-5633 ] [ Reptilian Research -- Longer Life through Colder Blood ] [ Don't be fooled by cheap Finnish imitations; BSD is the One True Code. ]
Current thread:
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd), (continued)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Greg A. Woods (Aug 10)
- RE: surge in spam email (fwd) Roeland M.J. Meyer (Aug 10)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Shawn McMahon (Aug 11)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) J.D. Falk (Aug 11)
- Message not available
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) J.D. Falk (Aug 11)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Andrew McNamara (Aug 09)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Steven J. Sobol (Aug 09)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Brad (Aug 09)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Henry R. Linneweh (Aug 09)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Jim Mercer (Aug 09)
- Re: surge in spam email (fwd) Pim van Riezen (Aug 09)
- RE: surge in spam email (fwd) Greg A. Woods (Aug 10)