nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento?
From: john heasley <heas () shrubbery net>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 13:44:45 -0800
Heya, I'm getting a huge jump in ping times from alter.netto Verio in whatappears to be Sacramento:horrifying that neither of these providers don't have nocs, eh? sheesh! randyLet's see, applying De Morgan's : randy: horrifying that these providers have nocs, eh? Boy, that's probably close to what he really meant <g>.
thanks, we all appreciate the content-free update(s). matthew, LSR traceroute seems to indicate the issue is between verio and sprint. the path is assym. 10 p4-4-2.r02.sttlwa01.us.bb.verio.net (129.250.3.37) 27.260 ms 27.855 ms 27.835 ms 11 sl-gw11-sea-1-1.sprintlink.net (144.232.236.1) 305.753 ms 309.921 ms 302.746 ms noc () verio net gratuitiously Cc'd.
Current thread:
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento?, (continued)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Joe Budion (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Randy Bush (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? John Fraizer (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Majdi S. Abbas (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Dan Hollis (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Alex Bligh (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? nanog (Dec 16)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? John Fraizer (Dec 17)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? john heasley (Dec 11)