nanog mailing list archives
Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento?
From: "Majdi S. Abbas" <msa () samurai sfo dead-dog com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:21:26 -0800
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 05:02:44PM -0500, John Fraizer wrote:
Alternatively, you could expect that the carrier might notice themself that there is a problem. Nah.... Forget I mentioned that. It'll never happen.
Oh, I'm sure it happened. However, if one day, they start notifying their customers of these issues in a prompt manner, it might reduce the amount of duplicate trouble tickets and public embarassment. Note, I'm not pointing any fingers at all...I'm sure we've all been guilty of it at some time. Just pointing out the benefits of proper notification. Yes, NANOG isn't the place for these reports, but we can expect them to continue as long as people are keeping their customers in the dark. --msa
Current thread:
- Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Mathew Butler (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Joe Budion (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Randy Bush (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? John Fraizer (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Majdi S. Abbas (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Dan Hollis (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Alex Bligh (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? nanog (Dec 16)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? John Fraizer (Dec 17)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? Roeland Meyer (Dec 11)
- Re: Alter.net and Verio peering in Sacramento? john heasley (Dec 11)