nanog mailing list archives

Re: Packet Loss

From: "Mark E. Perkins" <meperkins () att com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:41:35 -0500


Perhaps you mean 2680? (As in RFC)

--On Thursday, December 14, 2000 5:20 PM +0000 Randy Bush <randy () psg com>wrote:

Does anyone have a good definition of packet loss? If so, please send me
the appropriate verbiage. I cannot seem to articulate a strict
definition.

Current thread:

Packet Loss Charles Smith (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Mark E. Perkins (Dec 14)
    - Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Packet Loss Charles Smith (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Brian W. (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
  - RE: Packet Loss Patrick Greenwell (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Tony Rall (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Alex Bligh (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)

(Thread continues...)