nanog mailing list archives

Re: Packet Loss

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 09:50:51 -0800

Perhaps you mean 2680?


even better.  the whole ippm work makes good reading.

Current thread:

Packet Loss Charles Smith (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Mark E. Perkins (Dec 14)
    - Re: Packet Loss Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Packet Loss Charles Smith (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Brian W. (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
  - RE: Packet Loss Patrick Greenwell (Dec 14)
- Re: Packet Loss Tony Rall (Dec 14)
  - Re: Packet Loss Alex Bligh (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Roeland Meyer (Dec 14)
- RE: Packet Loss Karyn Ulriksen (Dec 14)

(Thread continues...)