nanog mailing list archives
Re: NATs *ARE* evil!
From: "Daniel L. Golding" <dan () netrail net>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 01:16:58 -0500 (EST)
In ARIN's defense, I've found that a phone call to them, to discuss a non-standard application with an IP analyst, often works wonders. Try giving them a call and point out the disconnect. In these sorts of cases, they almost always do the right thing. - Dan Golding NetRail, Inc. On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Jeff Mcadams wrote:
Also sprach David R HubermanWe're currently efficiently (according to ARIN's guidelines) utilizing a /20, 2 /23's and a /24. We apply to ARIN for space, and what do they say they'll give us? A /20. Period. Someone care to explain this to me?It means you didn't explain your goals clearly enough, I guess.What is there to explain?If you demonstrate to ARIN efficient utilization of 21 /24s (as you describe above), you qualify for 32 /24s for renumbering purposes; a /19.Go back and show them you've used 21 /24s efficiently and ask for sufficient address space with which to renumber and grow your business. You'll get a /19 every time.Hello...I'm using *more* than a /20 right *now*. If I had 100% efficient utilization of the IP addresses that we're using *today* I couldn't fit into just a /20. I can't come up with *any* logic that would make sense to renumber into a /20. This information was clearly spelled out on our application. If the folks at ARIN are too dense to add a few numbers together, you'd think they'd at least drop us an email or a phone call and ask a question or two! Sheesh! There is *NO* excuse for ARIN here, what they've done with us has *NO* rational explanation. -- Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm () iglou com Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848 IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456
Current thread:
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jeff Mcadams (Dec 14)
- Message not available
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jeff Mcadams (Dec 14)
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Robert Boyle (Dec 14)
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Daniel L. Golding (Dec 14)
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Richard Jimmerson (Dec 14)
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Brantley Jones (Dec 15)
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Dave Curado (Dec 15)
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jeff Mcadams (Dec 15)
- Message not available
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jeff Mcadams (Dec 15)
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Dave Curado (Dec 15)
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Jeff Mcadams (Dec 14)
- Message not available
- Re: NATs *ARE* evil! Fletcher E Kittredge (Dec 15)