nanog mailing list archives
Re: Where are ATM NAPs going?
From: David Charlap <david.charlap () marconi com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:27:05 -0500
Leo Bicknell wrote:
Regardless of how good the technologies are, the router vendors have killed ATM as a future nap technology. To use the Cisco example, ATM tops out an OC-12 ... If there were OC-48 or OC-192 ATM coming, and/or switches with the density to make that work it would have a future, but alas, that seems to not be in any vendors road map.
My company (Marconi) makes such a switch: http://www.marconi.com/html/solutions/asx4000.htm Non-blocking OC-48c ATM interfaces have been shipping for some time now. -- David
Current thread:
- Where are ATM NAPs going? Ben Buxton (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Jay Ford (Dec 18)
- RE: Where are ATM NAPs going? Christian Kuhtz (Dec 18)
- RE: Where are ATM NAPs going? Jay Ford (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Reid Knuttila (Dec 18)
- RE: Where are ATM NAPs going? Christian Kuhtz (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Jay Ford (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Leo Bicknell (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? David Charlap (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Leo Bicknell (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Alex Rubenstein (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Leo Bicknell (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Stephen Sprunk (Dec 19)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? David Charlap (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Leo Bicknell (Dec 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Sean Donelan (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Marshall Eubanks (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? Richard A. Steenbergen (Dec 18)
- Re: Where are ATM NAPs going? John Fraizer (Dec 19)