nanog mailing list archives
[OT] Re: Port scanning legal
From: Adam Rothschild <asr () latency net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 01:33:05 -0500
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 09:09:06PM -0600, Larry Sheldon wrote:
Well, let's quote it several more times [...]
Thanks so much for your ever-lasting contribution to this list. Like those who have come before you (Jim Phlemming, Bob Allisat, and kysi ferul all come to mind here, but surely I'm forgetting some), you help remind us how to configure procmail. For those not in the know, something like the following will do the trick: :0 * ^From: Larry Sheldon <lsheldon () creighton edu> /dev/null Perhaps we should organize a central repository of e-mail addresses of known net.k00ks, to help craft some filters accordingly? Now, back to our regularly scheduled discussion of the Cisco 7200VXR and incompatible PA's... -adam
Current thread:
- RE: Port scanning legal, (continued)
- RE: Port scanning legal Mathew Butler (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal J.D. Falk (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Steve Sobol (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal jlewis (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Mathew Butler (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Christian Kuhtz (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- Re: [OT]Port scanning legal Henry R. Linneweh (Dec 20)
- Re: [OT]Port scanning legal Brian W. (Dec 20)
- Re: [OT]Port scanning legal Henry R. Linneweh (Dec 20)
- Re: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- [OT] Re: Port scanning legal Adam Rothschild (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Larry Sheldon (Dec 19)