nanog mailing list archives
RE: Port scanning legal
From: "Matthew S. Hallacy" <poptix () POPTIX NET>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 04:01:14 -0600 (CST)
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Jeff Wheat wrote:
Isn't that just sweet... So in a nutshell it is *not* illegal for kiddies to port scan a network looking for vulnerabilities. It would seem to me that such scans would impair the integrity of ones networks, or am I just smoking crack?
IIRC, CETLink used to run an IRC server, and currently hosts the UnderNET IRC Network mailing lists, there are IRC scripts that portscan for open ports on IRC servers for the purpose of finding a better (less busy) port to use. What it boils down to, is determining the intent of the person doing the scanning, which 99% of the time cannot be easily proved either way, like guns, it could be for hunting, or it could be for murder, but how do you write a law that says 'You can buy a gun for hunting and sport, but not for killing people'? -poptix
Jeff CETLink.Net
Current thread:
- RE: Port scanning legal, (continued)
- RE: Port scanning legal John Fraizer (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Alex Rubenstein (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Deepak Jain (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Leo Bicknell (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal John Fraizer (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal mdevney (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Christian Kuhtz (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Todd Suiter (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Shawn McMahon (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Dan Hollis (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal L. Sassaman (Dec 19)
- Re: Port scanning legal Majdi S. Abbas (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Dan Hollis (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Steven J. Sobol (Dec 19)
- RE: Port scanning legal Patrick Evans (Dec 19)