nanog mailing list archives
RE: florida ix(en) facing south
From: Roeland Meyer <rmeyer () mhsc com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 10:40:26 -0800
From: Randy Bush [mailto:randy () psg com] Sent: Friday, December 22, 2000 9:59 AMKeep in mind that all of those actions, including turningup an interimfacility, were voted on by the membership. It's not like aMAE, where theoperator can take action without the consent of the members.oh goodie! it's a social club like the linx. do the current members get to vote on who can be new members too? are there fun fun fun membership meetings with cookies? some of we more stupid and lazy operators like exchanges which are run like a business. having primary attention on the bottom line often makes life simpler.
That also applies to root registries, like ICANN.
Current thread:
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south, (continued)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Christian Kuhtz (Dec 21)
- RE: florida ix(en) facing south Daniel Golding (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Deron J.Ringen (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Jeff Mcadams (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Lucy E. Lynch (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south Valdis . Kletnieks (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south - hohoho David Diaz (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south - hohoho Nathan Stratton (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south - hohoho Charles Sprickman (Dec 21)
- Re: florida ix(en) facing south - hohoho jlewis (Dec 21)