nanog mailing list archives
Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion)
From: "Howard C. Berkowitz" <hcb () clark net>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 11:23:36 -0500
At 03:30 PM 01/31/2000 -0800, dave o'leary wrote:
Attempts to "standardize" inter-NOC communication happened a couple of times in the early 90's in the IETF, but it got too ugly, with too many barriers (basically people not wanting to expose dirty laundry). I fear that attempts to do so now when the providers are *really* competing with each other (as opposed to back in the old daze when we were all friends :-) will suffer the same fate, other than on a pairwise basis between NOCs that cooperate well with each other anyway. dave
I have to chuckle reading this thread.We can't even get our NOCs to talk to each other, and Marketing people think we can do Inter-Provider QOS??
Hopefully I will have retired at an early age before we burn that bridge :) -Steve
Current thread:
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) Bill Woodcock (Feb 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 01)
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) Howard C. Berkowitz (Feb 01)
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) Sean Donelan (Feb 01)
- Re: inter-NOC communications (was:Re: Definition of Congestion) dave o'leary (Feb 03)