nanog mailing list archives
Re: whois broke again?
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:16:28 -0800 (PST)
On Mon, 21 February 2000, bmanning () vacation karoshi com wrote:Yes there are interesting scoping issues. Yes there are concerns wrt evil people and tolerent applications. But this tactic clearly puts the onus on the people in control of the useage, not some centralized repository.That sounds great, except the time when WHOIS is most important is when the contact has totally screwed up their site and can't be reached by any in-band network. The nice thing about WHOIS is it tends to be out-of-band with respect to most screw-ups. The notable exception is when NSI screws-up.
See DNS slaves w/ long timeouts. :)
The open question is why can RIPE get people to put good data in their database, and NSI can't manage to keep the little correct data they have uncorrupted?
'cause change control is tied up in legalities? 'cause the databases are too large/centralized? ... :)
Current thread:
- Re: whois broke again?, (continued)
- Re: whois broke again? Alex Rubenstein (Feb 19)
- Re: whois broke again? Danny McPherson (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 20)
- Re: whois and the internet broke again? Henry R. Linneweh (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? Sean Donelan (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? Henry R. Linneweh (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? Steve Sobol (Feb 20)
- Sharing and Cooperation (was Re: whois broke again?) William Allen Simpson (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? Henry R. Linneweh (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? bmanning (Feb 21)
- Re: whois broke again? Sean Donelan (Feb 21)
- Re: whois broke again? bmanning (Feb 21)
- RE: whois broke again? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Feb 21)
- RE: whois broke again? grisha (Feb 21)
- RE: whois broke again? Larry Snyder (Feb 21)
- Re: whois broke again? William Allen Simpson (Feb 21)