nanog mailing list archives
Re: whois broke again?
From: Danny McPherson <danny () tcb net>
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2000 08:11:39 -0700
While it would probably not be an accurate assessment, it could be assumed that they are doing nothing at all to fix problems ever; how would we know? Considering that we (as in ISP's) are the primary source of thier income, don't they owe this information to us, at least in a watered-down version?
Absolutely, unless assumming "us" == NANOG. But that's between each NSI customer and NSI, not NANOG and NSI. And as an NSI customer, once escalated to this level, it's something that I'd address directly and formally with those NSI folks, the ones that have that ve$ted interest in the success of NSI. I assure you that if you're able to demonstrate that all reasonable steps have been taken to follow the formal trouble reporting process, but to no avail, they'll be interested. and if not, well, sufficient documentation would then be in place to more formally address the problem. -danny
Current thread:
- Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?), (continued)
- Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) John R. Levine (Feb 21)
- RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) Tim Salo (Feb 21)
- RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) Patrick Greenwell (Feb 22)
- Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) Alex Bligh (Feb 22)
- Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) Randy Bush (Feb 22)
- RE: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) Roeland M.J. Meyer (Feb 21)
- Re: Alternatives (was Re: whois broke again?) Dana Hudes (Feb 21)
- Re: whois broke again? Alex Rubenstein (Feb 19)
- Re: whois broke again? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 20)
- Re: whois and the internet broke again? Henry R. Linneweh (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? Henry R. Linneweh (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? Steve Sobol (Feb 20)
- Sharing and Cooperation (was Re: whois broke again?) William Allen Simpson (Feb 20)
- Re: whois broke again? bmanning (Feb 21)
- RE: whois broke again? Roeland M.J. Meyer (Feb 21)