nanog mailing list archives
Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS
From: Paul Vixie <vixie () mibh net>
Date: 14 Jan 2000 18:44:29 -0800
Nope, they'll list anyone who blocks them, regardless of open relay status.If that's true, they're going too far, and won't be able to become widespread enough to matter.
Right. MAPS narrowly dodged that same bullet several times in the early days, and both ORBS and IMRSS were created as direct responses to our well-learned conservatism about who we will blackhole and why.
That's a damn shame.
Not really. Failure is a natural consequence of any nonscalable activity. -- Paul Vixie <vixie () mibh net> >> But what *IS* the internet? > It's the largest equivalence class in the reflexive transitive > symmetric closure of the relationship "can be reached by an IP > packet from". --Seth Breidbart
Current thread:
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS, (continued)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Greg A. Woods (Jan 14)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Steve Sobol (Jan 16)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Paul Vixie (Jan 16)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Steve Sobol (Jan 16)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Greg A. Woods (Jan 19)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Shawn McMahon (Jan 19)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Henry R. Linneweh (Jan 19)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Greg A. Woods (Jan 19)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Shawn McMahon (Jan 14)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 13)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Paul Vixie (Jan 14)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Greg A. Woods (Jan 14)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 15)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Greg A. Woods (Jan 15)
- Re: Fw: Administrivia: ORBS Alex P. Rudnev (Jan 15)