nanog mailing list archives
Re: MD5 in BGP4
From: Dan Debertin <airboss () bitstream net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2000 12:49:27 -0500 (CDT)
On 12 Jul 2000, Sean Donelan wrote:
Why we haven't seen more of these attacks I don't know for sure.
I'll venture a guess -- most attackers are interested in compromising UNIX boxes, not routers. ~Dan D. -- __________________________________________________________________ -- The trouble with doing something right the first time is that -- nobody appreciates how difficult it was. ++ Dan Debertin ++ Senior Systems Administrator ++ Bitstream Underground, LLC ++ airboss () bitstream net ++ (612)321-9290
Current thread:
- Re: MD5 in BGP4, (continued)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Kevin Oberman (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Jared Mauch (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Randy Bush (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Alex Bligh (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Randy Bush (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Alex Bligh (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Walter Prue (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Walter Prue (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Danny McPherson (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Shane Wright (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Sean Donelan (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Dan Debertin (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Danny McPherson (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Sean Donelan (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Danny McPherson (Jul 12)