nanog mailing list archives

Re: MD5 in BGP4

From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: 12 Jul 2000 13:56:07 -0700


On Wed, 12 July 2000, Danny McPherson wrote:

I suggest you go (re?)read RFC 2385.  Intuitively, 
it's called the TCP MD5 Signature Option, not the 
BGP MD5 Signature Option.


It wasn't clear in your original message you were speaking
about RFC 2385, I assumed you were using the authentication
option built into BGP in RFC 1654.

Current thread:

Re: MD5 in BGP4, (continued)
- - Re: MD5 in BGP4 Alex Bligh (Jul 12)
    - Re: MD5 in BGP4 Randy Bush (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Walter Prue (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Walter Prue (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Danny McPherson (Jul 12)
  - Re: MD5 in BGP4 Shane Wright (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Sean Donelan (Jul 12)
  - Re: MD5 in BGP4 Dan Debertin (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Danny McPherson (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Steven M. Bellovin (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Sean Donelan (Jul 12)
- Re: MD5 in BGP4 Danny McPherson (Jul 12)